Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:55

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

What’s next?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Why do people still think Michael Jackson was guilty?

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

What's wrong with generation Z?

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

What would happen if Kakashi and Naruto switched places?

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

NASA Switches to Backup Fuel Line After Psyche Thruster Glitch - Gizmodo

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Just in the last 5 years:

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

What are some cute picnic ideas for a romantic date?

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Is it wise to SECRETLY expose a narcissist by telling others that he/she is a covert narcissist?

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

David Beckham scores a winner with the royal circle - BBC

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Thank you.

What is the difference between anxiety and depressive neurosis?

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

New paper pushes back on Apple’s LLM ‘reasoning collapse’ study - 9to5Mac